Understanding Physics: The Influence of Cognitive Styles and Student Interest

Authors

  • Samsun Samsun Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Awaluddin Tjalla Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Iva Sarifah Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59188/jcs.v3i12.2944

Keywords:

cognitive style, learning interest, physics education

Abstract

This research investigates the influence of cognitive styles and learning interest on students' understanding of physics concepts. Using a survey method with a sample of 88 first-year students from four programs at a Health Polytechnic in South Jakarta, data were collected through questionnaires on cognitive style perception, learning interest, and a physics concept understanding test. Findings from multiple regression analysis reveal: (1) Cognitive styles and learning interest collectively have a significant influence on physics concept understanding (p = 0.000, F = 26.084); (2) Cognitive style perception independently affects concept understanding (p = 0.047, t = 2.013); and (3) Learning interest significantly impacts concept understanding (p = 0.001, t = 3.426). The study highlights the interplay between cognitive preferences and motivation in achieving mastery of physics concepts.

 

References

Amri, C., & Kurniawan, D. (2023). Study & learning strategies in improving language skills. Journal of Student Research, 1(1), 202–214.

Bargh, J. A. (2014). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In Handbook of social cognition (pp. 1–40). Psychology Press.

Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and critical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–80.

Burhanuddin, N. (2018). Philosophy of science. Gold.

De Ridder, D., Vanneste, S., & Freeman, W. (2014). The Bayesian brain: phantom percepts resolve sensory uncertainty. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 4–15.

Fitria, A. (2014). Misconceptions of students in determining groups in algebraic structures using certainty of response index (CRI) in the Department of Mathematics Education IAIN Antasari. Antasari State Islamic University.

Handayani, R. (2023). The effect of nutrition counseling on anemia using video media on knowledge and adherence to taking blood-boosting tablets in school-age adolescent girls in Batu Ampar District. Poltekkes Of The Ministry Of Health Palangka Raya.

Hasibuan, F. A., Harahap, A. M., & Hasibuan, T. (2024). Analysis of students' mastery of physics concepts through a four tier Moodle-based diagnostic test. MIND Journal of Education and Cultural Sciences, 4(2), 88–97.

Jonassen, D. H., & Carr, C. S. (2020). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. In Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 165–196). Routledge.

Kozhevnikov, M., Evans, C., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2014). Cognitive style as environmentally sensitive individual differences in cognition: A modern synthesis and applications in education, business, and management. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(1), 3–33.

Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (2014). Attitude strength: An overview. Attitude Strength, 1–24.

Misu, L., Budayasa, I. K., Lukito, A., & Rahim, U. (2019). Profile of Metacognition of Mathematics Education Students in Understanding the Concept of Integral in Category Classifying and Summarizing. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 481–496.

Puspitasari, W. D., & Febrinita, F. (2020). Students' perception of understanding the concept of motion kinematics is reviewed from the ability to think critically. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 9(2), 197–208.

Redish, E. F., & Kuo, E. (2015). Language of physics, language of math: Disciplinary culture and dynamic epistemology. Science & Education, 24, 561–590.

Saifuddin, A. F. (2015). The anthropological logic of a conversation (Imajiner) is about the basis of the paradigm. Gold.

Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. (2014). Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. Routledge.

Susanto, A. (2021). Philosophy of science: A study in the ontological dimension, epistemology, and axiology. Bumi Aksara.

Zahara, L., Suastra, I. W., Atmaja, A. W. T., & Tika, I. N. (2024). Perspective of Philosophy of Education in Developing Understanding of Physics Concepts. Consilium: Education and Counseling Journal, 5(1), 257–267.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Samsun, S., Tjalla, A. ., & Sarifah, I. (2024). Understanding Physics: The Influence of Cognitive Styles and Student Interest. Journal of Comprehensive Science (JCS), 3(12), 5623–5630. https://doi.org/10.59188/jcs.v3i12.2944