Observasi Perbandingan Kejahatan Pencucian Uang Antara Negara Indonesia Dan Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59188/jcs.v3i5.684Keywords:
Indonesia, Malaysia, Tindak Pidana Pencucian UangAbstract
Ada perbedaan dalam konsep, delik, dan pidana antara penerapan sistem follow-up kriminal di Indonesia dan Malaysia. Meskipun kedua undang-undang ini tidak sama efektif, AMLAFTA 2001 di Malaysia mengatur semua jenis tindak pidana yang dapat terindikasi follow-up crime dan berlaku luas, sedangkan UU No. 8 Tahun 2010 hanya mengatur 26 jenis tindak pidana. Di sisi lain, Indonesia mengatur subjek hukumnya secara terpisah, memisahkan follow-up crime antara individu dan perusahaan, sedangkan Malaysia mengaturnya secara bersatu. Namun, frasa "patut diduga" dalam UU No. 8 Tahun 2010 sering digunakan untuk idola, yang dapat menyebabkan kesewenangan dan ketidakadilan hukum. Oleh karena itu, menerapkan pertanggungjawaban pidana follow-up atas pelanggaran di Indonesia merupakan tantangan. Namun demikian, AMLAFTA tahun 2001 di Malaysia memiliki kejelasan dan kemudahan penerapan pertanggungjawaban pidana follow up crime dalam tindak pidana pencucian uang.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yuni Priskila Ginting
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
